Predictive and incremental validity of Students’ Learning Approach Test (SLAT-Thinking)
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v57i3.1514Mots-clés :
students' approaches to learning, external validity, predictive validity, incremental validityRésumé
SLAT-Thinking is the only test that evaluates and distinguishes stages of approaches through performance. Although SLAT-Thinking shows evidence of internal validity, its external validity has not yet been examined. In this paper we study the predictive and incremental validities of SLAT-Thinking. Two models were tested. The predictors were inductive reasoning, SLAT-Thinking approaches and Learning Approaches Scale (EABAP) approaches. The outcome was the Brazilian large-scale exam that evaluates the students that finish secondary education. In both models, the superficial approach of SLAT-Thinking was the main predictor, followed by inductive reasoning. The deep and superficial approaches of SLAT-Thinking were positively associated with academic achievement. While the deep intermediate approach was negatively associated to outcome. Non-linear relationships (positive and negative associations) were found in the two EABAP approaches and inductive reasoning with the outcome. This study shows evidence of predictive and incremental validity of SLAT-Thinking.
Références
Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2016). Social and cultural contexts change but intelligence persists as incisive to explain children's academic achievement. PONTE: International Scientific Researches Journal, 72(9), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2016.9.6
Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Cognitive performance and academic achievement: How do family and school converge? European Journal of Education and Psychology, 10(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2017.07.001
Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2018). The structure of intelligence in childhood: age and socio-familiar impact on cognitive differentiation. Psychological Reports, 121(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117723019
Alves, F. A., Flores, R. P., Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012). Preditores do rendimento escolar: inteligência geral e crenças sobre ensino-aprendizagem. Revista E-PSI, 1, 97-117. https://revistaepsi.com/artigo/2012-ano2-volume1-artigo5/
Banerjee, A., Chitnis, U. B., Jadhav, S. L., Bhawalkar, J. S., & Chaudhury, S. (2009). Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(2), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.62274
Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of meta-learning in study process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1985.tb02625.x
BRASIL/INEP (2011). Nota Técnica Procedimento de cálculo das notas do Enem. INEP, Brasília. http://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_basica/enem/nota_tecnica/2011/nota_tecnica_procedimento_de_calculo_das_notas_enem_2.pdf
Cardoso, C. O., Seabra, A. G., Gomes, C. M. A., & Fonseca, R. P. (2019). Program for the neuropsychological stimulation of cognition in students: impact, effectiveness, and transfer effect on student cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01784
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Erlbaum.
Costa, B. C. G., Gomes, C. M. A., & Fleith, D. S. (2017). Validade da Escala de Cognições Acadêmicas Autorreferentes: autoconceito, autoeficácia, autoestima e valor. Avaliação Psicológica, 16(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2017.1601.10
Dias, N. M., Gomes, C. M. A., Reppold, C. T., Fioravanti-Bastos, A., C., M., Pires, E. U., Carreiro, L. R. R., & Seabra, A. G. (2015). Investigação da estrutura e composição das funções executivas: análise de modelos teóricos. Psicologia: teoria e prática, 17(2), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p140-152
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). car: Companion to Applied Regression, R package (version 3.0-9) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/car.pdf
Golino, H.F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014). Psychology data from the “BAFACALO project: The Brazilian Intelligence Battery based on two state-of-the-art models – Carroll’s Model and the CHC model”. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1), e6. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.af
Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019). TDRI: Teste de Desenvolvimento do Raciocínio Indutivo, Hogrefe.
Golino, H. F., Gomes, C. M. A., & Andrade, D. (2014). Predicting academic achievement of high-school students using machine learning. Psychology, 5, 2046-2057. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.518207
Golino, H. F., Gomes. C. M. A., Commons, M. L., & Miller, P. M. (2014). The construction and validation of a developmental test for stage identification: Two exploratory studies. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(3), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100589
Gomes, C. M. A. (2007). Softwares educacionais podem ser instrumentos psicológicos. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 11(2), 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572007000200016
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010a). Avaliando a avaliação escolar: notas escolares e inteligência fluida. Psicologia em Estudo, 15(4), 841-849. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287123084020
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010b). Estrutura fatorial da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BaFaCalo). Avaliação Psicológica, 9(3), 449-459. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000300011&lng=pt
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010c). Perfis de estudantes e a relação entre abordagens de aprendizagem e rendimento Escolar. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 41(4), 503-509. http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/6336
Gomes, C. M. A. (2011a). Abordagem profunda e abordagem superficial à aprendizagem: diferentes perspectivas do rendimento escolar. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(3), 438-447. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722011000300004
Gomes, C. M. A. (2011b). Validade do conjunto de testes da habilidade de memória de curto-prazo (CTMC). Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 16(3), 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2011000300005
Gomes, C. M. A. (2012). Validade de construto do conjunto de testes de inteligência cristalizada (CTIC) da bateria de fatores cognitivos de alta-ordem (BaFaCAlO). Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia, 5(2), 294-316. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-82202012000200009&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Gomes, C. M. A. (2013). A construção de uma medida em abordagens de aprendizagem. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 44(2), 193-203. http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/11371
Gomes, C. M. A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Advocating the broad use of the decision tree method in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(10), 1-10. https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=22&n=10
Gomes, C. M. A., Amantes, A., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020). Applying the Regression Tree Method to Predict Students’ Science Achievement. Trends in Psychology. 28(1), 99-177. https://doi.org/10.9788/s43076-019-00002-5
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2007). Validação do modelo de inteligência de Carroll em uma amostra brasileira. Avaliação Psicológica, 6(2), 167-179. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712007000200007&lng=en&tlng=pt
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2008a). Avaliação da validade e fidedignidade do instrumento crenças de estudantes sobre ensino-aprendizagem (CrEA). Ciências & Cognição (UFRJ), 13(3), 37-50. http://www.cienciasecognicao.org/revista/index.php/cec/article/view/60
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008b). Qualidades psicométricas de um conjunto de 45 testes cognitivos. Fractal: Revista de Psicologia, 20(1), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-02922008000100019
Gomes, C. M. A. & Borges, O. N. (2009a). O ENEM é uma avaliação educacional construtivista? Um estudo de validade de construto. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, 20(42), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.18222/eae204220092060
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2009b). Propriedades psicométricas do conjunto de testes da habilidade visuo espacial. PsicoUSF, 14(1), 19-34. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100004&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2009c). Qualidades psicométricas do conjunto de testes de inteligência fluida. Avaliação Psicológica, 8(1), 17-32. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712009000100003&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Gomes, C. M. A., de Araújo, J., Ferreira, M. G., & Golino, H. F. (2014). The validity of the Cattel-Horn-Carroll model on the intraindividual approach. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(4), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101078
Gomes, C. M. A., Farias, H. B., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2022). Approaches to learning does matter to predict academic achievement. Revista de Psicología, 40(2), 905-933. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202202.010
Gomes, C. M. A., & Gjikuria, E. (2018). Structural Validity of the School Aspirations Questionnaire (SAQ). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 34, e3438. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3438
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012a). O que a inteligência prediz: diferenças individuais ou diferenças no desenvolvimento acadêmico? Psicologia: teoria e prática, 14(1), 126-139. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-36872012000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012b). Validade incremental da Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(4), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000400001
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2014). Self-reports on students' learning processes are academic metacognitive knowledge. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(3), 472-480. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201427307
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. (2015). Factor retention in the intra-individual approach: Proposition of a triangulation strategy. Avaliação Psicológica, 14(2), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2015.1402.12
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Menezes, I. G. (2014). Predicting School Achievement Rather than Intelligence: Does Metacognition Matter? Psychology, 5, 1095-1110. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.59122
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., Pinheiro, C. A. R., Miranda, G. R., & Soares, J. M. T. (2011). Validação da Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP) em uma amostra Brasileira. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722011000100004
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., Santos, M. T., & Ferreira, M. G., (2014). Formal-Logic Development Program: Effects on Fluid Intelligence and on Inductive Reasoning Stages. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(9), 1234-1248. http://www.sciencedomain.org/reviewhistory.php?iid=488&id=21&aid=4724
Gomes, C. M. A., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2019). Presenting the Regression Tree Method and its application in a large-scale educational dataset. International Journal of Research & Method In Education, 43(2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1654992
Gomes, C. M. A., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020). Comparing the Predictive Power of the CART and CTREE algorithms. Revista Avaliação Psicológica, 19(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1901.17737.10
Gomes, C. M. A., Lemos, G. C., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020). Comparing the predictive power of the CART and CTREE algorithms. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1901.17737.10
Gomes, C. M. A. & Linhares, I. (2018). Investigação da validade de conteúdo do TAP-Pensamento. [Pôster]. I Encontro Anual da Rede Nacional de Ciência para Educação (CPE). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31110.40006
Gomes, C. M. A., & Marques, E. L. L. (2016). Evidências de validade dos estilos de pensamento executivo, legislativo e judiciário. Avaliação Psicológica, 15(3), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2016.1503.05
Gomes, C. M. A., Marques, E. L. L., & Golino, H. F. (2014). Validade Incremental dos Estilos Legislativo, Executivo e Judiciário em Relação ao Rendimento Escolar. Revista E-Psi, 2, 31-46. https://revistaepsi.com/artigo/2013-2014-ano3-volume2-artigo3/
Gomes, C. M. A., Quadros, J. S., Araujo, J., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020). Measuring students’ learning approaches through achievement: structural validity of SLAT-Thinking. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 25(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20200004
Hebbali, A. (2020). olsrr: Tools for Building OLS Regression Models, R package (version 0.5.3) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/olsrr/olsrr.pdf
Muniz, M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Pasian, S. R. (2016). Factor structure of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices. Psico-USF, 21(2), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712016210204
Osei-Bryson, K. (2008). Post-pruning in regression tree induction: An integrated approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 1481-1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.017
Pereira, B. L. S., Golino, M. T. S., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019). Investigando os efeitos do Programa de Enriquecimento Instrumental Básico em um estudo de caso único. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(7), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3477577
Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2018). Proposing a method to create metacognitive school exams. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(8), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2313538
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.0) [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Reppold, C. T., Gomes, C. M. A., Seabra, A. G., Muniz, M., Valentini, F., & Laros, J. A. (2015). Contribuições da psicometria para os estudos em neuropsicologia cognitiva. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 17(2), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p94-106
Soper, D.S. (2023). Beta (Type II Error Rate) Calculator for Multiple Regression [Software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
Therneau. T., & Atkinson, B. (2019). rpart: Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees R package (version 4.1-15) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/rpart.pdf
Valentini, F., Gomes, C. M. A., Muniz, M., Mecca, T. P., Laros, J. A., & Andrade, J. M. (2015). Confiabilidade dos índices fatoriais da Wais-III adaptada para a população brasileira. Psicologia: teoria e prática, 17(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p123-139
Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of Approaches to Learning: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 132–157), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Jhonys de Araujo, Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi 2023
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Interamerican Journal of Psychology is published since 1967 by the 