Phonological awareness: Cross-linguistic comparisons with a focus on Spanish

Authors

  • Amanda Clinton University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v45i2.156

Abstract

The purpose of the present literature review is to highlight differences and similarities in fundamental reading processes depending upon the language of the learner. Specific attention is paid to contrasts between the relatively opaque English language and more transparent languages, with a specific focus on Spanish. Analysis of the literature indicates a steeper developmental curve in languages such as Spanish, although processes are similar. Findings highlight the way in which a more opaque native language could inform learning of a second, more transparent language.

Downloads

Published

2012-08-08

How to Cite

Clinton, A. (2012). Phonological awareness: Cross-linguistic comparisons with a focus on Spanish. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v45i2.156

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 2 (2011): Interamerican Journal of Psychology

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).