Differential change in folk disease concepts’

Authors

  • Roland G. Tharp
  • Arnold Meadow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v7i1%20&%202.660

Abstract

The hypothesis is proposed that in the Mexican-American, Anglo-American contact situation, folk-medicine beliefs do not change as an aggregate but that individual component of these beliefs will undergo modification according to the degree to which they mesh with the etiological assumptions of the superordinate culture. To test this hypothesis an interview study was conducted using as subjects 250 randomly selected Mexican-American families in Tucson, Arizona. Results indicated that explanations of diseases which are expressed by naturalistic etiological concepts are less resistant to extinction than those expressed in terms of emotional origin. The latter in turn were more persistent than diseases explained by magical etiological conceptions.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-18

How to Cite

Tharp, R. G., & Meadow, A. (2017). Differential change in folk disease concepts’. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 7(1 & 2). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v7i1 & 2.660

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 & 2 (1973): Interamerican Journal of Psychology/Revista Interamericana de Psicología

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).