La psicología social como crítica: Continuismo, estabilidad y efervescencias tres décadas después de la “crisis”

Auteurs

  • Lupicinio Íñiguez-Rueda

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v37i2.822

Résumé

This paper asks about the effects of the “crisis of social psychology” three decades after it began. Also, the paper offers a diagnosis of the contemporary situation of social psychology, which shows its little influence on the contemporary practices. The paper searches as well into the roots of this discipline, in order to find some support for a more coherent exercise with the implications of the critical period. Finally, the paper offers a description of “social psychology as a critique”, which is understood as a continuous questioning and problematization of any practices of knowledge production within social psychology.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2017-07-30

Comment citer

Íñiguez-Rueda, L. (2017). La psicología social como crítica: Continuismo, estabilidad y efervescencias tres décadas después de la “crisis”. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v37i2.822

Numéro

Vol. 37 No 2 (2003): Interamerican Journal of Psychology/Revista Interamericana de Psicología

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).