Papel da Justiça na Relação do Sexismo e na Violência Contra Mulher
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v55i3.1591Palavras-chave:
Âmbito de justiça, sexismo; violência, discriminação justificada.Resumo
A aplicação dos princípios de justiça é restrito nos amorosos, contribuindo para a aceitação da violência contra a mulher. Objetivou-se analisar se a percepção dos estudantes universitários sobre o âmbito de justiça será o elemento justificador da aceitação da violência contra a mulher. Participaram 305 estudantes universitários. Os resultados demonstraram que as pessoas mais sexistas, que também acreditam que o mundo é um lugar justo, são as que restringem mais o âmbito da aplicação de justiça, ou seja, percebem o casamento como sendo excluído desse âmbito. Logo, this study study data importante in studies over the paper the context social in legitimação das desigualdades sociais.
Referências
Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V. C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohen, E., & Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368-384.
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665-692. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665
Correia, I., (2010). Psicologia social da justiça: fundamentos e desenvolvimentos teóricos e empíricos. Análise Psicológica, 1 (XXVIII), 7-28.
Correia, I., Pereira, C. R., & Vala, J. (2018). Under victimization by an outgroup: belief in a just world, national identification, and ingroup blame. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1160), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01160
Correia I., Alves H., Morais R., Ramos M. (2015). The legitimation of wife abuse among women: the impact of belief in a just world and gender identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.041
Correia, I., & Vala, J., (2003). Crença no mundo justo e vitimização secundária: o papel moderador da inocência da vítima e da persistência do sofrimento. Análise Psicológica, 3 (XXI), 341-352.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446.
Dalbert, C.; Montada, L. & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte welt als motiv: validierungskorrelate zweier skalen. Psychologische Beitrage, 29, 596–615.
De Judicibus, M., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Blaming the target of sexual harassment: Impact of gender role, sexist attitudes, and work role. Sex Roles, 44(7/8), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011926027920
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
Feldman-Summers, S., & Palmer, G. C. (1980). Rape as viewed by judges, prosecutors, and police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7, 19-40.
Formiga, N. S., Gouveia, V. V. & Santos, M. N. (2002). Inventário de sexismo ambivalente: sua adaptação e relação com o gênero. Revista Psicologia em Estudo, 7(1),105- 111.
Gracia, E., García, F., & Lila, M. (2011). Police attitudes toward policing partner violence against women: Do they correspond to different psychosocial profiles? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510362892
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139022736.005
Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbaş, G., Orta, İ. M., Ceylan, S. (2015). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 75(11), 543–554.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. Guilford Press.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
IPEA (2019). Atlas da violência. Brasília: Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum Press.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.85.5.1030
Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the ‘‘innocent victim’’: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
Lila, M., Gracia, E., & García, F. (2013). Ambivalent sexism, empathy and law enforcement attitudes towards partner violence against women among male police officers. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19 (10), 907-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.719619
Lima- Nunes, A., Pereira, C. R., & Correia, I. (2013). Restricting the scope of justice to justify discrimination: the role played by justice perceptions in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1981
Lima, T. J. S., Pereira, C. R., Torres, A. R. R., Souza, L. E. C., & Alburquerque, I. M. (2019). Black people are convicted more for being black than for being poor: The role of social norms and cultural prejudice on biased racial judgments. PLoS ONE, 20, 14(9), e0222874. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222874
Modesto, J. G., Minelli, A. C., Fernandes, M. P., Rodrigues, M., Bufolo, R., Bitencourt, R., & Pilati, R. (2017). Racismo e Políticas Afirmativas: Evidências do Modelo da Discriminação Justificada. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 33, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3353
Nader, M. B. (2017). In C. Stevens, Silva, E., Oliveira, S., & Zanello, V. (Eds.), Relatos, análises e ações no enfrentamento da violência contra as mulheres (pp.105-130). Technopolitik.
Opotow, S. (2016). Social justice theory and practice: fostering inclusion in exclusionary contexts. In L. Phillip & Jr., Hammack (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Social Psychology and Social Justice, (pp. 1-31). Oxford University Press.
Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: an introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x
Opotow, S. (2001). Social injustice. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 102–109). Prentice-Hall.
Opotow, S., & Weiss, L. (2000). Denial and exclusion in environmental conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 475–490.
Paiva, T. T., Pereira, C. R., Silva, E. M. L., & Pimental, C. E. (2021). Development and validation of the acceptance of violence against women scale (AVAWS). Manuscript submitted for publication.
Pereira, C. R., & Souza, L. E. C. (2016). Fatores legitimadores da discriminação: uma revisão teórica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32 (2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e322222
Pereira, C. R., & Vala, J. (2010). Do preconceito à discriminação justificada. In-Mind_Português, 1(2-3), 1–13.
Pereira, C. R., Mateus, K. S., & Santos, M. F. (2019). Do preconceito à discriminação: o papel da legitimação das desigualdades sociais. In S. C. Maciel, & P. N. Fônseca (Eds.), Psicologia Social: Vertentes e perspectivas (pp. 79- 101). Editora UFPB.
Perilloux, C., Duntley, J.D., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Blame attribution in sexual victimization. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.058
Pimentel, C. E., Gouveia, V. V., Diniz, P. K. C., Saenz, D. P., Santos, A. M. V., & Vieira, I. S. (2010). Evidências de validade de construto e precisão da Escala Geral do Mundo Justo. Boletim de Psicologia, 60 (133), 167-180.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social Dominance Theory and the Dynamics of Intergroup Relations: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
Qualtrics, L. (12 de Novembro de 2014). Qualtrics. Obtido de http://www.qualtrics.com/
Rollero, C., Bergagna, E., & Tartaglia, S. (2019). What is violence? The role of sexism and social dominance orientation in recognizing violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519888525
Russell, K. J., & Hand, C. J. (2017). Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and Just World Beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.008
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: na intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Opression. Cambridge University Press.
Valor-Segura, I., Expósito, F., & Moya, M. (2011). Victim blaming and exoneration of the perpetrator in domestic violence: the role of beliefs in a just world and ambivalent sexism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14 (1), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.17
Verniers, C., & Vala, J. (2018). Justifying gender discrimination in the workplace: The mediating role of motherhood myths. Plos One, 13(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190657
Viki, G.T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533-537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749
Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American Psychologist, 44(4), 695–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.4.695
World Health Organization (WHO, 2020). Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564625
Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.H. (2018). Practical Statistical Power Analysis Using Webpower and R (Eds). ISDSA Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Tamyres Tomaz Paiva, Cicero Roberto Pereira
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Interamerican Journal of Psychology is published since 1967 by the 