Confiabilidad test-retest y confiabilidad entre jueces de la prueba de clasificacion de objectos del Riley W. Cahndler en la muestra del I.D.P.E.M.

Authors

  • Luisa Morales Castilla
  • Brenda A. Marcela
  • Don Witzke

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v2i2.512

Abstract

The present study was aimed at providing reliability coefíicients over time, as well as between judges, for the Object Classification Test of Riley W. Gardner. The results show levels of reliability consistent with the fundamental changes associated with the develop­mental process. Inter-judge reliabilities for 50 protocols, scored in­dependently by two judges, varied between .89 and 1.00.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-10

How to Cite

Morales Castilla, L., Marcela, B. A., & Witzke, D. (2017). Confiabilidad test-retest y confiabilidad entre jueces de la prueba de clasificacion de objectos del Riley W. Cahndler en la muestra del I.D.P.E.M. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v2i2.512

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (1968): Interamerican Journal of Psychology/Revista Interamericana de Psicología

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).