Practica masiva contra practica distribuita: Una revision

Autores

  • Luiz F.S. Natalicio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v3i2.547

Resumo

A review is made of some of the many theories that have been advanced attempting to explain massed vs. distribution of practice effects. At the present time no one or group of theories has been shown adequate to explain the phenomenon. An adequate theory will have to specify the sufficient conditions which determine the facilitation that distribution of practice yields.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-07-15

Como Citar

Natalicio, L. F. (2017). Practica masiva contra practica distribuita: Una revision. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v3i2.547

Edição

v. 3 n. 2 (1969): Interamerican Journal of Psychology/Revista Interamericana de Psicología

Seção

Articles

Licença

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).